About Get Alerts Login
September 08, 2010
Browse by Regions and/or Topics

Eurasian Security Institutions: The CSTO and SCO

Richard Weitz | Bio | 29 Jun 2010
World Politics Review

Login to Discuss EmailEmail | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconReprint

Perhaps the most surprising feature of the protracted crisis in Kyrgyzstan is what has not happened: Neither of Eurasia's two preeminent regional security institutions, the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), have coordinated a military intervention in that country.

The mass protests, deaths, and refugee crisis involving perhaps 1 million people has represented one of the most acute challenges to Eurasian stability in the history of either organization, both of which were founded almost a decade ago. In mid-June 2010, the Kyrgyz interim authorities even directly appealed for Russian military intervention on their behalf, but Moscow declined to act military -- either unilaterally or within the framework of either the CSTO or the SCO. Both organizations have offered primarily verbal support and limited humanitarian assistance to their beleaguered member state. Despite expectations, neither organization has yet become a modern version of the Warsaw Pact, using military and police power to keep its client regimes in power. ...

subscribe to World Politics Review

WPR

Subscribers receive:

  • Access to in-depth feature articles
  • Regular Strategic Posture Reviews
  • Regular WPR Special Reports
  • Access to our Document Center
  • Access to WPR’s entire archives
  • Enhanced search across the entire site
  • Participation in our discussion section

Click here to subscribe »
Click here to take a free trial »
Already a subscriber? Login here.

Login to Discuss EmailEmail | Print IconPrint | Share Icon Share | Reprint IconReprint